Friday, December 11, 2015

20. IBN JARĪR AL-ȚABARĪ



20. IBN JARĪR AL-ȚABARĪ
There are many great classical commentators of the Qur’ān which become the main sources of contemporary scholars in further understanding the meanings of the Qur’ān. One of them was Abū Ja‘far Muḥammad Ibn Jarīr al-Țabarī, the native of Tabaristan (224- 310/839-923). He is considered by Muslim scholars “the father of the science of tafsīr”.  He was born in Amol, Tabaristan, modern Mazandaran, about 20 km south of the Caspian Sea in Iran. Although he was a Persian, all his works was written in Arabic. He wrote on many subjects, such as poetry, grammar, ethics, mathematics, medicine history in commentary of the Qur’ān. His best known works are Jāmi‘ al Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān (The Comprehensive Exposition of the Interpretation of the Verses of the Qur’ān), also known as Tafsīfr al-Țabarī, and Tārīkh al-Rusul wa al-Mulūk (History of the Prophets and Kings), often referred to Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī.  As he wrote extensively history which had not been written like it he was also called “the Father of History.”
Al-Ṭabarī started learning at his early age. At seven he memorised the Qur’ān, at eight he started leading the prayer, at nine he started studying the Ḥadīth (Prophetic traditions), and at twelve he left home to pursue his study. At Rayy (Raghes) he stayed about five years where he studies the Hanafi school, the sīrah (biography of the Prophet) by Ibn Isḥāq, and pre-Islamic history. Then he travelled to   Baghdad and studied under Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal for a short period as he died later, and he found out that he did not learn much from him as he considered him just a recorder of ḥadīth rather than a jurist (faqīh). Then he went to Basrah, Kufah, and Wasit, where he studied the various madhhabs (schools of jurisprudence): Mālikī, Shāfi‘ī, and Ẓāhirī under its founder Dāwūd al-Ẓāhirī. He followed the Shāfi‘ī school for some times, then he established his own school.
On his return to Baghdad, the vizier at that time ‘Ubaydullāh Khāqān offered him a tutoring position for ten dinars a month. It was said that he taught so well that he was offered a tray of dinars and dirhams, but he declined. Then in his late twenties he went to Syria, Palestine, and Egypt. In Beirut he studied the Syrian school’s variant readings of the Qur’ān as well as the legal views of al-Awzā‘ī.
  Like great scholars before and after him he suffered from some kinds of allegations, and the worst of it of being a Rāfiḍī[1] and a Shī‘ī[2]. This allegation became spread among scholars, among them was Ibn Ḥajar who said of him: “He is reliable, honest, and has slight bias [to the Shi‘ah] and tolerated friendship [with them] "(ثقة صادق فيه تشيع يسير وموالاة لا تضر). But al-Țabarī had written a book praising Abū Bakr and ‘Umar entitledفَضَائلُ أَبِي بَكْر وَعُمَرُ  (“The Virtues of Abū Bakr and ‘Umar”), whereas the Shī‘ah denounced both of them. He wrote this book when he found out that there was a person in his hometown Amol who cursed these two prominent companions of the Prophet. He mentioned their merits and repudiated the allegation against them. Because of this, the wali (ruler) of the town summoned him, and he fled to Baghdad where he passed away before completing the book.
The people of Iraq in general and of Baghdad in particular where al-Ṭabarī lived were followers of the Ḥanbalī school. When he said that Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal was a compiler of traditions and not a proper jurist because he based his views on traditions without using qiyās (analogy) people became angry with him. His followers would often throw stones at his house. When the Baghdad chief of police tried to organize a debate between him and the Ḥanbalīs to settle their differences he accepted it, but they did not show up. Instead, they came later to pelt his house with stones again.
When al-Ṭabarī died in Baghdad on Sunday evening 26 Shawwāl 310/16 February 923) reaching the age of 85 years he was buried secretly by the ‘Abbasi authority for fear of mob violence by the Ḥanbalīs. The historian Yāqūt al-Ḥamawī (d.  626/1229) also said that because of this allegation of being a Rāfiḍī when he died he was buried at night for fear of the people. According to the Qur’ān commentator Ibn Kathīr he was buried in his house because some Ḥanbali followers did not want him to be buried in the day time, and they alleged him to be a Rāfiḍī following the allegation of their teacher Muhammad ibn Dāwūd al-Ẓāhirī. Ibn Kathīr rejected the allegation saying that al-Țabarī was one of the Muslim scholars who knew and practised the Qur’ān and the Sunnah of the Prophet.
The most acceptable view was that of the historians al-Kha
īb al-Baghdādī and Ibn ‘Asākir who said: “The number of people who gathered together at his funeral procession was uncountable except by Allah, and people prayer funeral prayer at his grave several months days and nights. He was buried the next day on the early morning of Monday in his house at Ya‘qūb Public Square in Baghdad.
 Al-Țabarī was said that he wrote forty pages every day for forty years.  Many of his works were lost, but his Jāmi‘, better known as Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī, has survived. He was “a man of encyclopaedic learning who absorbed the whole mass of tradition in his time”. His Tafsīr consists of thirty volumes containing collections of ḥadīths with their full isnād (chains of transmitters) dealing with the commentary on the Qur’ān. He deals with whole chapters, although not whole verses, of the Qur’ān. He used to give his view after mentioning many different views, and said “the right view for me in this matter is ….” (…والصواب من القول في ذلك عندي أن يقال). Later commentators, such as al Zamakhsharī (d. 538/1143), Ibn ‘Aiyyah (d. 542/1147 or 546/1151), Ibn Kathīr (d. 774/1373) and al Suyūī (d. 991/1505) followed al-Ṭabarī in examining and explaining the whole Qur’ān in their tafsīr works.
Al-Ṭabarī’s Tafsīr was highly recommended by Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728/1328) who stated that it was one of the best, and the worthiest of its kind. Abū Bakr al-Khaīb al-Baghdādī called it “a book which has never been written like it,” whereas the jurist Abū Ḥāmid Aḥmad al-Isfarāyīnī said, “If a man travels to China to get it would not be much.” Scholars in his time praised him so much that he was said to be a reliable scholar, one of the great leaders of the Sunnīs whose view was accepted, whom people referred to  for his deep knowledge and sound method. The writing of his Tafsīr was completed within seven years starting from 283 AH till 290 AH in Baghdad.
Al-Ṭabarī in his Tafsīr included many Jewish legends (إسْرَائِلِيَّات) taken from Jewish converts, such as Ka ‘b al-Aḥbār, Wahb ibn Munabbih, ‘Abd Allāh ibn Sallām, ‘Abd al-Malik ibn Jurayj, and others so that it reached almost 2,500 legends, but he mentioned their isnād (chains of transmitters), and he rarely mentioned the sound and the weak. He never took from suspected people like Muqātīl and al-Kalbī.
Al-Ṭabarī’s Tafsīr was printed in 30 volumes by al-Amīriyyah Printing Press at Būlāq, Cairo in 1321/1903, then it was printed and copied many times until it was verified by Aḥmad Muḥammad Shākir, and about half of it was published  in 16 volumes at Dār al-Ma‘ārif in Egypt in 1374/1955. In 1420/200 it was verified by Aḥmad Muḥammad Shākir again, and was printed again, and was published for the first time by Mu’assah al-Risālah in 24 volumes. Nowadays, with the advance of technology in this 21th Century, we are able to read this book through the internet. If you open al-Maktabah al-Shāmilah (المكتبة الشاملة), literally means “the Comprehensive Library”, by using WinRAR you will find thousands of classical books in various topics in Arabic. One of my main sources in this library is this Tafsīr of al-Ṭabarī.
Al-Ṭabarī was an ascetic person. When the vizier al-‘Abbās ibn al-Ḥasan asked him to write a book on Islamic law for him, he wrote the summary of his book Laṭīf al-Qawl and presented it to him. The vizier was so happy, that he sent him one thousand dinars as present, but he rejected it. When he was told that he should take it and give it away as charity to whom he liked, he said that they knew more those who deserved it.
Like other scholars before and after him, al-Țabarī also wrote poetry. Among his poetry is as follows:
إِذَا أَعْسَرْتُ لَمْ يَعْلَمْ رَفِيْقِي  *   وَأَسْتَغْنِي فَيَسْتَغْنِي صَدِيْقِي
حَيَائِي حَافِظٌ لِي مَاءَ وَجْهِي *   وَرِفْقِي فِي مُطَالَبَتِي رَفِيْقِي
وَلَوْ أَنِّي سَمَحْتُ بِمَاءِ وَجْهِي * لكُنْتُ إِلَى العُلَى سَهْلَ الطَّرِيْقِ
 (البحر الوافر: مفاعلتن مفاعلتن فعولن)
When I am in trouble my companion does not know it,
and [when] I am in no need [of help], then my friend is also in no need [of help].
My shamefulness protects my self-respect,
 and my tenderness [protects me] from asking
 [favour from] my companion.
And if I let myself sacrifice my honour,
I would have easily attained glory.
          This poem indicates al-Ṭabarī’s honesty, his humbleness, his self-confidence, his trust in Allah, his contentment, his shamefulness, and his self-respect which are among good qualities of pious Muslims like him. May Allah reward him for his dedication to Islam, āmīn!        (CIVIC, 4 December, 2015)
المصادر:
المكتبة الشاملة
تفسير الطبري (ت. 310 هـ(
 http://www.alukah.net/culture/0/
 http://www.alukah.net/web/alshibl/0/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaidiyyah
https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/   إسماعيلية
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafida
http://dofni.iugaza.edu.ps/Ossol_Conf/الإسرائيليات في تفسير ابن جرير الطبري.


[1]The term Rāfiḍī (رافضي) means “the one who rejects”; Rāfiḍah (رَافضة)  is its collective plural, and its multiple plural is   Rawāfiḍ (روافض) , both meaning “those who reject.” The terms are referred  by  Snunnī Muslims to the Shī‘īs who reject  legitimacy of the succession of Abū Bakr, ‘Umar and ‘Uthmān as Muslim leaders after Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. Originally the Rafiḍah were followers of the Shī‘ah in  Kufah and were with Zayd ibn ‘Ali ibn al-Ḥusayn ibn ‘Ali against the Umayyad caliph Hisham ibn ‘Abd al-Malik (ruling through 724-743 CE). When Zayd ibn ‘Ali refused to condemn the three earlier caliphs, namely, Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, and ‘Uthmān, arguing that they had been accepted by ‘Ali himself, they rejected and deserted him. However, the term is also applied to the Twelver Shī‘ah who reject (some of them even openly condemn) the three earlier caliphs, as legitimate leaders of the Muslims.  
[2] The term شِيْعَة (Shī‘ah) is an abbreviation of شيْعةُ عَلِي, (Shīʻatu ʻAlī), “followers of ‘Ali” who believe that the proper succession of the Prophet was his son-in-law and cousin ‘Ali, instead of his father-in-law Abū Bakr. They believe that Ali have been divinely appointed as the successor of the Prophet, as the first Imam, succeeded by certain individuals among his descendants (ahl al-bayt, “the People of the House”) who possessed infallibility and other divinely-ordained traits. Between 10% and 13% of Muslims are followers of Shi’ah, most of them live in Iraq, Iran, India and Pakistan, and 85% of them are Twever Shi’ah. The Zaydī Shī’ah, also called al-Zaydiyyah (الزَّيْدِيَّة) named after Zayd ibn ‘Ali, the grand-son of Ḥusayn ibn ‘Ali, constitute roughly 0.5% of the world's Muslim population. Most of them live in Yemen, but they make up about 35-40% of its Muslim population. They do not believe in the infallibility of Imāms after Husayn and that the Imāmate must pass from father to son. Instead, they believe that it can be held by any descendant from either Hasan ibn ʻAlī or Husayn ibn ʻAlī. The third main group of the Shī‘ah is the Ismā‘īliyyah, named after Ismā‘īl son of Ja ‘far al-Ṣādiq (the sixth Imam), also called the Bāiniyyah for their belief in the existence of inner interpretation of the Qur’an. The term in means “inner, hidden, secret” which is the opposite of ẓāhir which means “obvious, clear, external.” Most of them live in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Syria.

 

Friday, November 27, 2015

19. ASBĀB AL-WURŪD



19. ASBĀB AL-WURŪD
The Muslim scholar Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyyah (691-751/1292-1349) said that the root of every bid‘ah (innovation) and deviation in Islam is misunderstanding what Allah and His Messenger had intended; it is even the source of every mistake in the principles and branches of religion, especially if it is accompanied with bad intention."
Allah said in the Qur’ān that He had perfected Islam, had completed His Favour upon us, and had chosen for us Islam as our religion (Q. 5:3). However, many Muslims still do not fully understand the meanings and the laws derived from it. Muslim scholars have different levels of understanding its meanings and these laws, as nobody knows it entirely except Allah. Allah gives different levels of knowledge and wisdom to His servants, and this is Allah’s Wisdom, so that they have to learn from each other, and come to mutual understanding and agreement.
          Among the Prophet’s companions some of them who were more knowledgeable than the others or who had better quality than the others:  the most knowledgeable on farā’iḍ (the law of inheritance) was Zayd ibn Thābit, the most knowledgeable on the reading of the Qur’ān was Ubayy ibn Ka‘b, on what is ḥalāl (legal, permitted) and on what is ḥarām (illegal, prohibited) was Mu‘ādh ibn Jabal, on the interpretation of the Qur’ān was ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās, the most compassionate towards the Muslims was Abū Bakr, the most strict on Allah’s command was ‘Umar, the most shy was ‘Uthmān, and it was reported that the most knowledgeable on judicial decision was ‘Alī, whereas the amīn al-ummah (the trusty of the community) was Abū ‘Ubaydah ibn al-Jarrāḥ.
          Among the importance science in understanding the ḥadīth isأَسْبَابُ وُرُوْدِ الْحَدِيْث  (the reasons for the  mentioning the ḥadīth), or simply called asbab al-wurūd. There are many benefits of knowing it, among which are as follows:
1.    Understanding the motive of the ḥadīth, such as:
لَيْسَ مِنَ الْبِرِّ الصَّوْمُ فِي السَّفَرِ  (رواه البخاري وغيره)
It is not part of piety to fast in traveling
(Reported by Bukhārī and others)
The Prophet said it when he saw fasting people suffering. But in normal condition, he did not criticize people who are fasting and non-fasting in traveling.
2.    To specify the general concept (تَخْصِيْصُ اْلعَام), such as the following ḥadīth as narrated by ‘Ā’shah r.a.  the Prophet s.a.w. said:
صَلَاةُ الْجَالِسِ عَلَى النِّصْفِ مِنْ صَلَاةِ الْقَائِمِ (رواه أحمد)
The reward of praying sitting is half of the reward of
praying standing (Reprted by Ahmad)
                   ‘Abd al-Razzāq and Ibn ‘Umar reported that while they were entering Madinah it was very hot, and people were tired and were praying sitting in the mosque. Then the Prophet entered the mosque, saying: “The reward of praying sitting is half of the reward of praying standing” as mentioned above. This is apparently applied to people who are sick and tired prayed whether the obligatory or recommended prayer sitting. However, Muslim scholars give their commentaries, among which as follows:
                   Muslim scholars agree that those who are unable to stand in prayer because of sickness and others will have full reward either in obligatory or recommended prayer. Al-Tirmidhi and Sufyān al-Thawrī said that healthy people only will get half of the reward if they pray sitting in performing recommended prayers only, but not allowed in obligatory prayer, as Allah said,
وَقُومُوا لِلَّهِ قَانِتِينَ (البقرة:238)
“… and stand before Allah in obedience” (Q. 2:238),
and the Prophet said,
صَلِّ قَائِمًا ، فَإِنْ لَمْ تَسْتَطِعْ قَائِمًا فَقَاعِدًا ، فَإِنْ لَمْ تَسْتَطِعْ
فَعَلَى جَنْبٍ (رواه البخاري)
Pray standing, if you cannot stand, sit down, and if
 you cannot, then on yourside (Reported by Bukhari)
          If the imām is sitting because he is unable to stand because of sickness or others while leading the obligatory prayer, are the ma’mūm also to sit down praying following the imam, or they have to stand?  There are two views: (a). They can also sit down following the imam according to Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal and Isḥāq ibn Rāhawayh, and practised by Abū Hurayrah and Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah among the ṣaḥābah. (b). The majority of scholars say that it is not allowed to pray obligatory prayer sitting for healthy people, neither praying alone, as imām or behind the imam, based on theQur’ānic verse (Q. 2:238) above. The imām can pray sitting while the ma’mūm standing as Abū Bakr and other ṣaḥābah did while the Prophet was sitting in prayer. This is the view of al-Shāfi‘ī, Abū Ḥanīfah, Abū Yūsuf, Mālik, Abū Thawr, and Dā’ūd ibn ‘Alī.
3.   To specify the ambiguous ((تَعْيِيْنُ اْلمُبْهَم, such as the following hadith, as narrated by Anas ibn Mālik the Prophet s.a.w. said:
إِنَّ مِنْ عِبَادِ اللَّهِ مَنْ لَوْ أَقْسَمَ عَلَى اللَّهِ لأَبَرَّهُ  (متفق عليه)
Verily, there are among Allah’s servants who
 if heswears to Allah, He would verily fulfill it
 (Reportedby Bukhari and Muslim)
Anas ibn Mālik said that his paternal aunt al-Rubayyī‘ daughter of al-Naḍr broke the front tooth of a slave-girl, but neither forgiveness nor blood-money was accepted, so people came to the Prophet asking for retaliation, and he accepted it. But her brother (who was also called Anas) said to the Prophet, “O Messenger of Allah, are you going to break her front tooth? By Allah Who sent you with truth, do not let her front tooth to be broken.” But the Prophet said: “O Anas, the Book of Allah has prescribed retaliation.” Then people became content and accepted the blood-money.
4.    Elaborating the general concept (تَفْصِيْلُ الْمُجْمَل), such as:
عَنْ أَنَسٍ قَالَ : أُمِرَ بِلاَلٌ أَنْ يَشْفَعَ الأَذَانَ وَيُوتِرَ الإِقَامَةَ
إِلاَّ الإِقَامَةَ.(رَوَاهُ الْبُخَارِىُّ و غيره)
 Anas narrated: “Bilal was order to say
 the adhan twice, and iqāmah once except
 iqamah (i.e. qad qāmat al-ṣalāh)
(Reported by Bukhari and others)
                   There are about 248 ḥadīths concerning the ādhān (calling for prayer) and iqāmah (announcing that the prayer is about to begin), most of them are narrated by Anas ibn Mālik. Some of them give details upon which scholars based their views, as follows:
a.     The wordings of the ādhān are read twice except la ilaha illallah, which is said once only, based on the vision of ‘Abdullah ibn Zayd ibn Rabbih and approved by the Prophet.
b.   The wordings of the iqāmah, according to:
(1) Abū Ḥanīfah, they are like the ādhān, but read       quickly
(2) Al-Shāfi‘ī, Mālik, al-Awzā‘ī and Ibn Ḥanbal, they are read once, except qad qāmatiṣ ṣalāh is read twice according to al- Al-Shāfi‘ī.
                        With regard to the ruling of ādhān and iqāmah  some say that they are collective duties ((فَرْضُ كِفَاية, others say that they are  recommended acts ((سُنّةُ.
5.    Explaining what is not clear, such as the Prophet’s saying:
صَلاةٌ فِي هَذا اْلمَسْجِدِ أْفْضَلُ مِنْ مِائَةِ أَلْفِ صَلاةٍ فِيْمَا
سِوَاهُ مِنَ اْلمَسَاجِدِ (مصنف عبد الرزاق)
One prayer in this mosque is better than one
 hundred thousand times better than in any
 mosque. (‘Abd al-Razzāq’s Muṣannaf)
Shurayd on the day of the conquest of Makkah told the Prophet that he had made a solemn pledge to pray in the Prophet’s mosque in Madīnah if he (the Prophet) was successful in conquering Makkah. The Prophet told him that praying in the Inviolable Mosque in Makkah would be sufficient for him. Then the Prophet mentioned the merit of one prayer in it is better than one-hundred thousand prayers in any other mosque.
6.     Knowing the abrogating (النَّاسِخ) and the abrogated (اْلْمَنْسُوْخ)  Narrated ‘Abdullah ibn Mas‘ūd: “We used to participate in the holy battles led by the Messenger of Allah and we had nothing (no wives) with us. So we said, "Shall we get ourselves castrated?" He forbade us that and then allowed us to marry women with a temporary contract. Then ‘Abdullah ibn Mas‘ūd recited to us: 'O you who believe! Make not unlawful the good things which Allah has made lawful for you, but commit no transgression.'” (Q. 5:87). (Reported by Bukhari).[1] The above ḥadīth stated that temporary marriage called Nikāḥ Mut‘ah (نِكَاح مُتْعة), or simply called mut‘ah was allowed in the early stage of Islam in Madinah, but the Prophet finally prohibited it forever. Salamah ibn al-Akwa‘ and Jābir ibn Abdullah said:
إِنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ص.م.- قَدْ أَذِنَ لَكُمْ أَنْ تَسْتَمْتِعُوا (رواه البخاري و مسلم)
Verily, the Messenger of Allah's Messenger (peace be
 upon him) has granted  permission to you to practice
 mut‘ah.”  (Reported by Bukhārī and Muslim)
Later the above ḥadīth was abrogated by many other hadiths, among which are as follows:    
   يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاُس إِنِّي قَدْ كُنْتُ أَذِنْتُ لَكُمْ فِي اْلِاسْتِمْتَاعِ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ
 وَإِنَّ اللهَ قَدْ حَرَّمَ ذَلِكَ إِلَى يَوْمِ اْلقِيَامَةِ فَمَنِ كَانَ عِنْدَهُ مِنْهُنَّ شَيْءٌ
فَلْيًخَلِّ سَبِيْلَهُ وَلَا تَأخُذُوْا مِمَّا آتَيْتُمُوْهُنَّ شَيْئًا (رواه مسلم)  
0 people, I had permitted you to contract temporary
 marriage with women, but Allah has forbidden it (now)
until the Day of Resurrection. So he who has any (woman
 with this type of marriage contract) he should let her off,
 and do not take back anything you have given
 to them (as dower). (Reported by Muslim)
Imam al-Nawawī said that mut‘ah was allowed and prohibited twice: allowed before the campaign of Khaybar, then was prohibited after it; it was allowed on the day of the conquest of Makkah for three days, and then was prohibited permanently till the Resurrection day. It is said that it was also allowed for three days on the days of the campaign of Khaybar.  
        It was reported that ‘Aī ibn Abī Ṭālib said that the Prophet on the Day of Khaybar prohibited forever the mut‘ah and eating of the flesh of the domestic donkeys (Reported by Bukhārī and Muslim). Imam Aḥmad and al-Bayhaqī also reported that the Prophet prohibited the mut‘ah.
          There are other benefits in knowing the asbāb al-wurūd of the Prophet’s statements such as the restricting the unrestricted (تَقْيِيْدُ اْلُمْطْلَق), which would clarify what he meant in his statements.          (Civic, 27 November, 2015)
المصادر:
المكتبة الشاملة
تفسير الطبري (ت. 310 هـ(
تفسير القرطبى (ت. 671 هـ(
تفسير ابن كثير (ت. 774 هـ)
د. محمد أبو النور الحديدي, عصمة الأنبياء والرد على الشبه الموجهة إليهم,
مطبعة الأمانة¸القاهرة 1399\1979)
د.  بدر عبد الحميد هميسة.علم أسباب ورود الحديث الشريف
http://bayanelislam.net/Suspicion.aspx?id=01-04-006 http://www.academia.edu/3214679/Asbab_Wurud_al-Hadith
http://fatwa.islamweb.net/fatwa/index.php?page=showfatwa&Option=FatwaId&Id=485


[1] Qur’ānic commentators, such as al-Tābarī, al-Qurubī, and Ibn Kathīr do not say explicitly that among the good things in the above verse is  the mut‘ah, but rather any good thing in general including marriage, as many of the companions of the Prophet  gathered together in the house of ‘Uthmān ibn Maẓ‘ūn, and agreed among themselves to fast in the day time, pray at night, not to sleep on mats, not to eat meat and fat, not to approach women and perfume, to wear coarse woolen fabric, to reject the worldly life, to wander in the land and to be like monks. Then the above verse was revealed to them, so that they would not abandon the good things, including marriage. There is no monasticism in Islam.